736 and 73G advice on economic issues, thank you

[color=#333333][font=arial, sans-serif][size=2]I have a question, why the same one route, 736 only 136 seats, but they consume more fuel than 73G, resulting in unit costs by 11%? They are not using a similar engine? And the weight of 736 to less than 73G.

Thank you advice!

Also, I have almost no English translation of this text provided by Google, please forgive any errors[/size][/font][/color]

I personally do not know the exact figures, but I agree with you that 736 should consume less fuel than 73G. There are other similar well-known examples, too. However, the overall system is in the process of a new makeover by the AS team which promises a more realistic experience. Before that we have to stick to what we have currently :blush: