I know that the a320neo and the cseries will eventually be in in the new Qumby IV but I am just wondering how long it will be untill they will be in the other gameworlds.
Just wondering if anyone knows.
I know that the a320neo and the cseries will eventually be in in the new Qumby IV but I am just wondering how long it will be untill they will be in the other gameworlds.
Just wondering if anyone knows.
Yes yes yes!!!I KNOW!
I DO!!!!
How about this?
http://community.airlinesim.aero/topic/72-airbus-a320neo/
or this?
http://www.airlinesim.aero/blog/2016/02/08/quimby-A320neo-and-other-news/
It's done, when it's done.
People will complain anyway, either because why it's not been done properly because the team rushed or because it took so long to get it right.
I dont want know the exact release.Just eximate how long it need so i can save up some money for it.
Sorry for my english,im from germany.
I've been previously too optimistic, so I don't want to give an exact date. Though as previously suggested, we try very hard to have the adjusted performance values ready for release on the new Quimby world.
That should then include the new Airbus A32xneo models, The 242t A330, new 737 scimitars, and the COMAC ARJ21-700. We also have the CSeries ready so that we can release them together with the first delivery.
I've been previously too optimistic, so I don't want to give an exact date. Though as previously suggested, we try very hard to have the adjusted performance values ready for release on the new Quimby world.
That should then include the new Airbus A32xneo models, The 242t A330, new 737 scimitars, and the COMAC ARJ21-700. We also have the CSeries ready so that we can release them together with the first delivery.
So you meen that we can soon have fun with them ;). Thank you very much for the work put in, in getting us these aircraft.
CSeries ready?
Are they allready in use?
CS100 and 300?
The CSeries is not yet in use. Swiss will be the first operator and delivery of the CS100 is scheduled for Q2.
But we will be ready with the aircraft and will be able to release it, once it is in real life operation.
I've been previously too optimistic, so I don't want to give an exact date. Though as previously suggested, we try very hard to have the adjusted performance values ready for release on the new Quimby world.
That should then include the new Airbus A32xneo models, The 242t A330, new 737 scimitars, and the COMAC ARJ21-700. We also have the CSeries ready so that we can release them together with the first delivery.
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but this statement sounds, as if you will add the complete A32Xneo family, including the A319neo & A321neo & A321LR and not only the A320neo?
My wording was not completely precise. We are currently working on the full families, but as usual, we only release the aircraft once they are actually in service in real life.
But we will have them ready and with further deliveries, we will be able to introduce them without delay.
http://airlineroute.net/2016/04/21/lx-cs1update1/
Swiss scheduled CS100 for inaugural flight July 15th.
Any chance we can get performance number loaded for aircraft evaluation before it actually available for purchase?
Which specific values do you want to know? Possibly I can post a screen shot here.
Can you give us a glimpse (screenshot) of the aircraft type information page? Price, production rate, performance graph, cargo/passenger capacity and runway requirements would be very helpful. And will introduction into AS come at the delivery date (somewhere in June) or at the first scheduled flight (July 15)?
Which specific values do you want to know? Possibly I can post a screen shot here.
it's not about any specific value actually, more like a fleet planner want to compare the new type using 'Aircraft Type Evaluation' function.
I might be asking a little bit too much, but who knows maybe it's possible..
could it be actually loaded in the system, just like info page without 'request quotation' button or any purchase related action (http://riem.airlinesim.aero/action/enterprise/aircraftsType?id=xxxxx) and the aircraft data accessible for evaluation.
otherwise, one can always wait until it actually in service.. :D
It seems that it's quite popular on the test server. Already produced 139 CS100s :lol:
Any chance we can also get the CS300? I think it's also already defined
Please let's wait the few weeks until we can release the first model. The data is not yet 100% guaranteed to be final and it will just add to confusion, if we have then different version out.
It seems that it's quite popular on the test server. Already produced 139 CS100s :lol:
Any chance we can also get the CS300? I think it's also already defined
:blush: and 100+ CS300... can't resist its sexy look :wub: ... and you will be happy with it, no doubts. :)
EDIT: In comparison to A319neo and A320neo the main "workers" on the data have done a great job in terms of realism. :)
:blush: and 100+ CS300... can't resist its sexy look :wub: ... and you will be happy with it, no doubts. :)
EDIT: In comparison to A319neo and A320neo the main "workers" on the data have done a great job in terms of realism. :)
Not only the look, the performance data looks great: long range and excellent rwy requirement :D. Definitely a good model to choose for starting an airline in an airport with low PAX demand.
Let’s just hope it turns out to be a wonder machine in real life as well to become a commercial success. Not always did the most technologically advanced product win a fight in the end, and as long as Boeing gives away his 737-700 for 22 million USD, it’s going to be hard…
In AS it is indeed the perfect compromise for those who think the CRJ and E-Jets have a too short range and the 320 a too large capacity and cost.