After 6.3 my flight plans all look similar to this:
1909
Some details: On both Pearls and Gatow at least, I’m using firefox.
Refresh your browser
No Change.
No Change.
But should.
Tried STRG+F5 ?
I am also having same issue in ellinikon. Browser change didnt help
A hard reload (shift+F5 or whatever the keycombo is for your browser) should fix it. It did for me.
A hard refresh on Firefox/Fornebu got me to this. Is this the new flight plan visual after 6.3? It's not easy to read.
Looking at existing schedules, I can see that IS, sadly, what it is supposed to look like. :wacko:
Aw, man...I'm having the same problem... I don't mind the idea itself, but the current graphic design is poorly readable.
Same problem with Chromium and Firefox. What browser does it work with?
Edited, ok after restarting and relaoding, I got something almost readable like
<span><a class="" href="http://community.airlinesim.aero/user/9525-clfi3012/" title=""><span>clfi3012</span></a></span>
Can someone explain what all the numbers mean? Can I just ignore them
Frankly, it is difficult to read compared to the previous one
[url=http://postimg.org/image/vvp61dnfb/]
[/url]
Edit: They brought back the hours and minutes on the bars. Thus, it is now readable.
The numbers are to do with dynamic turnarounds. The video helps:
http://www.airlinesim.aero/blog/2015/10/13/6.3-dynamic-turnarounds-video/
But it is much harder to read. I think it's because your eye has to look in two places to accurately see the time- the hour along the top bar and within the grid for the minutes, further complicated by another time in the green turnaround bar.
Ctrl-F5 worked. Thanks. However, I still find it hard to read, with 20 minute turnarounds I can’t even read the destination airport.
Ctrl-F5 worked. Thanks. However, I still find it hard to read, with 20 minute turnarounds I can't even read the destination airport.
So that's why on Quimby there are no 20-minute turnarounds, the shortest is like 40-minutes. So that you can read the airport code on the flight plan ;)
Yes, that is how it should look @clfi3012 and @mr_ryan. I was also quite negative when I first saw it and I felt confused but I got used to it, I actually really like it. It also is harder for the slot blockers using LETs to read. lol.