Slot blocking at CDG using LETs

It's funny on the one hand but sad on the other. There are complains about airlines using a LET to small airports where nothing other works. There are no complains about airlines connecting 10-bar airports 100x a day with a 737 or E-Jet. At the end this all is a matter of the circumstances. AirlineSim is not just a normal leisure game and lives from a fair interaction - the discussion about the slots are running since airlinesim exists. In the former days we also had other restrictions like (standard) terminal size etc. - and skiping one after the other leaded to a more boring issue. Anyhow - we won't find a solution for everyone, as long as we do have some aircraft with these advantages.

 

 

I know what you want to hear - and it is not far away from what is my opinion. But currently there is no rule backing this up. At least there is no clear border between legal and ilegal defined (which is btw. very difficult to find). So currently this is somehow legal - or "better" - it is not ilegal.

I agree that the 100x a day flights between bigger airports is a larger problem in terms of total slots blocked.

IMO there are two issues with how the game works that allow this to happen:

1.) Bookings are per flight so 100x daily flights out of a total of 200 on a route with identical ratings will get 50% of all direct PAX while 10x flights out of 110 with identical ratings will get 9% of all direct PAX. Smaller airplanes are also much easier to fill up so we are comparing 100 flights with 40/40 PAX each to 10 flights with 72/400 PAX each.

2.) There is little cost associated with each slot and the cost is not tied to airport congestion. Real airlines pay millions for slots and having a way that each slot/landing is dynamically charged higher on congested airports would go a long way to promote more realistic behavior by making 100x daily E-Jet flights or LETs from size 10 to size 1 airports just as unprofitable as they would be in reality.

 Real airlines pay millions for slots

Real airlines pay at only a handful of Level 3 Coordinated airports (but not all). And they do not pay to the airport, but rather to other airlines. If an airport has a slot available, that slot is available free of charge to the airline. Real Airlines usually do not pay for slots at most of the airports they serve. For slots they buy, it is actually a bit shady practice, because slot trade is not endorsed by IATA/ICAO. Wen airlines do actually pay to other airline, the slots are basically exchanged/transferred and the payment is for "something else". The free assignment of slots is given in AS by the computer, if slot is available, same as in real life. I do not see there is anything wrong with current slot assignment in AS or a need to charge for the slots, because that would be far from simulating reality.

The following guidance notes summarise and paraphrase the slot rules and regulations.  This guidance should not be relied upon exclusively.  It is recommended to refer to the original text (eg, IATA Worldwide Slot Guidelines and EU Slot Regulation – available in the Library area of the website) and, where necessary, seek professional advice. 

Airport slot allocation is governed globally by the IATA Worldwide Slot Guidelines and, within the EU, by the EU Slot Regulation 95/93 as amended.  There are also national or local laws in some countries.

Slot allocation occurs at airports that are designated as coordinated (Level 3) – an airport where there is a significant and lasting shortfall in capacity and, in order to land or take-off, it is necessary to have a slot allocated by a coordinator.  A slot is a permission to use the full range of airport infrastructure necessary to operate an air service at a particular time and date, eg, runway, terminal, apron, gates, night quota, etc.

Slots are allocated in scheduling seasons – summer starting in late March and winter starting in late October.  The allocation of slots occurs in advance of the biannual IATA Slot Conferences held each November (summer) and June (winter).

The primary allocation of slots is an administrative process – available slots in the pool are allocated for free by a coordinator based on a set of allocation priorities and criteria.  

One of the priorities is that new entrants receive priority in the allocation of 50% of the slot pool.  An airline is considered a new entrant at an airport on a particular day if, upon allocation, it would (a) hold fewer than five slots in total on that day, or (b ) for an intra-EU route with less than three competitors, hold fewer than five slots for that route on that day.

Airlines can earn historic rights or grandfather rights to a series of slots, provided they operate the slots as allocated by the coordinator at least 80% of the time during a season – the use-it-or-lose-it rule.  Airlines can lose historic rights to slots for repeated and intentional slot misuse.  

A series of slots is at least five slots at the same time on the same day of the week, distributed regularly in the same scheduling season, eg, a series of 09:15 departure slots over at least five consecutive Mondays.

Unless prohibited by the laws of a country, airlines can trade their rights to historic slots in a secondary market.  These trades may be accompanied by monetary or other compensation.

Within the EU, slots are traded by way of a slot exchange – slots are swapped between airlines on a one-for-one basis.  The exchange involves swapping historic peak time slots for newly allocated off peak slots.  The off peak slots are returned to the pool after the exchange, so that the net effect of the exchange is the transfer of peak time slots from Airline A to Airline B.

On 30 April 2008, the European Commission issued a clarification of the Slot Regulation.  In his press release, Jacques Barrot, Vice-President of the European Commission, said: 

"At crowded airports, we need to make sure that slots are used as efficiently as possible and that airlines have a fair chance to develop their operations. Slots at airports must be distributed in a fair and non-discriminatory way. Today we are recognising for the first time that secondary trading is an acceptable way of allowing slots to be swapped among airlines. We will keep a close eye on the situation across Europe and ensure that secondary trading works to the advantage of consumers, but this system has already shown its value in London, where it has allowed a range of airlines to take advantage of the opportunities provided by the EU-US aviation agreement and to create new levels of competition."

So I guess reality has the same unfair competition rules for slots that Airline sim does then ( or perhaps it's the other way around :) )

"Deloitte has calculated that in Europe the most valuable landing slots are those at London Heathrow, followed by Charles de Gaulle, Gatwick and Frankfurt. Based on a recent transaction the implied value of a pair of peak time slots at London Heathrow is currently worth between £25 and £30 million. The value of slots varies primarily depending on the time of day they are for.

Whilst EU regulations are in place to ensure landing slots are allocated fairly, they have generally failed to significantly erode the presence of the ‘national flag’ carrier airlines at key airports."

You could also argue that the slot situation in airline sim is in many cases is considerably worse then at real airports due to higher demand, meaning the impacts are felt even more.

...AND we cannot trade/exchange slots in AS.... (we can maybe free it up for an alliance partner, but there is really no monetary compensation involved).