Superjet vs Embraer, Fuel burn.

English Boards General
1
I was evaluating the Superjet vs E-jets and I saw a very unfair comparison, E-195 and 190 are way way profitable than superjet.
 
In real life superjet's engines have less thrust and SaM-146 Engines (Superjet) are 12% more economic than GE CF34-10E. 
 
I think it could be reviewed in the game, as a fan of Superjets, it's being difficult for me to compete with another companies that uses E195 for example.
2

You cannot compare against a jet that carries 20% more pax ... your CASM/CASK will be much higher on a smaller jet and on a larger jet.

That's like comparing CASM for E170 vs E195, or E190 vs 737-700.

Compare SSJ95 vs E190, to get much better estimate, and there you have roughly same CASM/CASK on both plane types.

Now if you compare to CRJ1000, there you will see that CRJ1000 has much lower CASM/CASK than either E190 or SSJ95.

aw6ubp.png

3
thanks for the tip rubiohiguey
 
In my opinion it will be more realistic for the game if the manager reconfigure the Superjet at least to have the same consumption since in real life the Superjet it's less fuel burner than the E190.
 
3169 (SSJ100) vs 2841 (E190), Superjet should have around 2500/2600 in this example.
 
According to Sukhoi, ongoing certification tests confirmed that the aircraft's direct operating costs are 6–8% lower than E190/195.
 
The engine of Superjet: 77Kn in APR
 
The engine of E190/95: 89Kn in APR
4
thanks for the tip rubiohiguey
 
In my opinion it will be more realistic for the game if the manager reconfigure the Superjet at least to have the same consumption since in real life the Superjet it's less fuel burner than the E190.
 
3169 (SSJ100) vs 2841 (E190), Superjet should have around 2500/2600 in this example.
 
According to Sukhoi, ongoing certification tests confirmed that the aircraft's direct operating costs are 6–8% lower than E190/195.
 
The engine of Superjet: 77Kn in APR
 
The engine of E190/95: 89Kn in APR

It will not be possible to reconfigure the consumption until the new engine performance system is implemented.

It is the same case where B737-800 has higher fuel consumption than an old B737-400, and even higher on some routes than B737-900ER which is much bigger aircraft than B737-800.

According to AS, the current formula is somewhat static, so they cannot change it at the moment without breaking the whole system.

I guess you will need to wait for the new engine performance system, which should be implemented within a year.

AS development has been put on hold for the past 3 months, as server problems arose, this was now resolved about two weeks ago, so hopefully AS team will now be able to dedicate time to new features and improvements. (in spite of the server issues taking up all the AS team's time, we still got one big improvement, schedule transfer between the aircraft)

5

thanks for the explanation