Interesting to see that the 737-8-200HGW costs more to lease, is less efficient in distance, needs more runway than the normal 737-8-200 for the same pax. Same is true for the 737-8 and 737-8-hgw and the -9 version.
Seems a mistake in my opinion
Mike
The HGW models are carrying more weight along with a higher MTOW and the same fuel load. That leads to the slight reduction in range at full payload for the HGWs but they are carrying more weight then the standard models. The higher MTOW with the same engine power drives up the takeoff and landing distances.
My graphs are extremely close to the Boeing data in the APM but if you want to have a look please let me know if you find something. Current MAX data in game uses D6-38A004 Rev. K. Dated July 2025 as it has MAX 10 data.
1 Like
Same cargo load same pax? More expensive less efficient.
More cargo & same pax.
737-8 HGW & 737-8-200 HGW 1,134KG
737- 9 HGW 3,720KG
737-10 HGW 2,767KG
Not really (Paine)
737-8/8HGW -8-200 /-8-200HGW all have max cargo 7267kg
The HGW version has less range in the -8 and -8-200 Both also need more runway and cost more. If you look at the 737-7 then you see that the HGW version fly’s 4000km further have a different price tag. This would be normal.
the 737-10 has the same the HGW is more expensive, has better range and economics.
As for aircraft eval. see screen shot. All the HGW’s are not better but worse. route JFK-LAX
PS All other worlds are correct. just checked a few of them its only in PAINE
Pricing and ranges
The numbers I posted were the differences in the additional cargo weight carried by the HGW version over the standard model.
Paine has data for the -7 & -10 that is preliminary since they are not currently certified.
All other worlds are incorrect unless they have the 1.5 performance profile applied.
Feel free have a look but we use a special built tool to get the data extremely accurate. The data is directly from Boeing.