In the real world, according to all my research, the A380 is more economical the the 747-4. Yet in Airlinesim the 747-4 is considerably more economical.
Even better ist the new 747-8.
Can you really get that many PAX to fill in an A380 ingame? ;)
If u can fill it in reality why not ingame?
Because reality and AS are two totally different things - if you take a look at how AS' rating system and demand distribution works right now...If u can fill it in reality why not ingame?
Sure, you can fill them, but you’d be better off using the smallest possible cost efficient type of aircraft for your network as long as you have free slots.
Can you really get that many PAX to fill in an A380 ingame? ;)
Filling 372 seats is not hard on a high demand route.
Filling 372 seats is not hard on a high demand route.
I know. I also run 747 on some routes and it's making profit. but it would be only certain routes, not a lot
Filling 372 seats is not hard on a high demand route.
Isn't that a too small amount of seats? I don't know any real airline that is operating A380s with less than 500 seats.
Isn't that a too small amount of seats? I don't know any real airline that is operating A380s with less than 500 seats.
Are we having this discussion again?
My A380 (which I don't have) would run 60 C / 366 Y version A and and 60 C / 312 Y version B.
lol... I just see my version B would be same as CBE's version.
Oh, didn't know about Korean Air's configuration. Sorry.
lol... I just see my version B would be same as CBE's version.
It is a different configuration to the one you use. I can tell you more in a PM when I come home and have my PC or my MAC (3 weeks).