I was wondering what going on over there with the support team?
I can understand that you guys don’t have to time to awnser within a day (even though you say so). But common missing airport data,
And violations of the rules by players.
So I hope I can lure a repsone out of you guys as it seems that’s this is the only way to point out things to you guys.
Airport data for cargo demand makes no sense E.G DWC has less demand than Sharja and AUH while in real life it surpassed both. OKA in Japan is actually the 4th busiest cargo airport in Japan but now it has less demand than CTS FUK and NGO, it makes no sense also they operate night cargo flights.
But the biggest WT*** I see in the game especially the new world Xiguan is that one airline blatently copied a real world’s airline Name and logo come on.the airline is based in the north west of the USA and is a cargo airline.
Airport data for cargo demand makes no sense E.G DWC has less demand than Sharja and AUH while in real life it surpassed both. OKA in Japan is actually the 4th busiest cargo airport in Japan but now it has less demand than CTS FUK and NGO, it makes no sense also they operate night cargo flights.
…
Cargo "demand" generally makes not much sense the way it is done in game.
Airports like ANC, LEJ... (or OKA) handle lots of cargo because they are used as hubs, not because there's plenty of demand there. The amount of cargo processed through those hubs is translated into "demand" in AS.
So going by the logic AS uses you are probably right, though I'd love to have a more realistic approach to this - but I understand this is close to impossible to achieve.
Cargo "demand" generally makes not much sense the way it is done in game.
Airports like ANC, LEJ… (or OKA) handle lots of cargo because they are used as hubs, not because there’s plenty of demand there. The amount of cargo processed through those hubs is translated into “demand” in AS.
So going by the logic AS uses you are probably right, though I’d love to have a more realistic approach to this - but I understand this is close to impossible to achieve.
I find this disappointing tho is this is the way they look at cargo because, airports like DXB AUH DOH AMS and LHR are also major hubs for Pax with the vast majority of people connecting than having the destination as final (AMS and LHR maybe as exception) . But still it’s like cargo is not really important to the game. While aircargo get more and more important by the day.
Like is it to much to ask for an data update? like running a cargo airline is like playing the game om hard difficulty level XD
You can always report a name directly on the airline’s overview page if it violates the rules. These requests will be answered relatively promptly.
The logos are manually viewed by a team of volunteers. It may well be that one or the other slips through. Also here please simply report and the logo will be deleted.
The report button doesn’t work the airline is up for 3 weeks already. So I guess I’ll take the warning points AS TEAM can you tell me why allow a company called China southern cargo airlines? And using the logos of the real CZ.
Oh and no I’m no jealous but if we can use real names I would like to request Nippon Cargo Airlines (KZ/NCA) ありがとうごさいます / thank you very much
The buttons are working. Might be that support has not taken any actions yet, I don’t know.
But: what is your problem? This company is violating the naming rules - not really a problem for you but for Simulogics.
So why do you complain that no action is taken? It is only an issue with names… which is not a big problem, don’t you agree?
I don’t get why you came here and complained about someone breaking a rule and then switched gears to say now you would like to break the rule. Plain and simple it’s a rule and he broke, that doesn’t mean you can break it too. What might be the case is that they are waiting on a response from the player. I am not 100% sure but I would imagine they would give the player a chance to pick a new name before they take any action.
Oh sorry I forgot this forum is full of sensitive… People. Have you ever heard of sarcasm?
FYI I’ve asked for a different name but not a copyrighted one ;).
Please look up the definition of sarcasm if it’s confusing :).
Because rules are rules. One of the reasons why we lost the IPO its because people where not following the rules. Also a lot of people complain about the price increase imagine when China southern takes legal action (and yeah big airlines can be thst pity)
That’s correct. But while we take some to to coordinate a new name with the player, the logos should (in this case) have been a clear decision and deleted right away. So I’ve now taken over handling that report and taken care of deleting the logos.
I am not so sure about legal demands by real airlines after all you can use real names on private Gameworlds, so they (airlines) could go after them on private Gameworlds as well …
With the private gameworlds AS isn’t making money directly from the players. So I could see it be spun as “the owner pays for the servers so the intellectual property of the airlines isn’t connected to any profit being made by AS”