RUAG DO 228 NG is also available brand new on Gatow.
Aspern?
I don’t see why it shouldn’t be possbile
WHY in the world doesn't OTTO IV have the RUAG Do-228???
I really don’t understand.
The RUAG is available on Aspern.
WHY in the world doesn't OTTO IV have the RUAG Do-228???
I really don’t understand.
We'll look into that. Should be possible to make it available on all game worlds.
AGAIN, let me ask, ........why is the RAUG Do-228 NG not still available on the new OTTO IV server??
It has been 3 weeks and still nothing!
My strategy in the game was very reliant on that aircraft and I have been forced to use an alternative!
your strategy was reliant on an aircraft not available on that particular server? sorry, mate, but that sounds like a terrible strategy.
Indeed…
your strategy was reliant on an aircraft not available on that particular server? sorry, mate, but that sounds like a terrible strategy.
Yukawa, I suppose you are a wizard who knows everything that would be in place on a new server even before being launched?
Some of us are more mortal - we base our plans on reasonable expectations (the absence of which remains unexplained even now!)
Regardless, I will like to understand why RAUG Do-228NG is missing from Otto.
Spezialist already wrote that he / they will look into it.
It will not make it faster if you shout. That's pretty clear.
If you need advice which other planes could be good for your setup on Otto IV, you will find some players who can help.
Highscore,
I need no advice. Thank you.
Perhaps you should look at the date when that response was given. Even third world governments act faster than A/S team.
Sorry to copy and paste but the same is relevant;
Right everyone, I hope we have all had a good nights sleep.
So the following is not open to discussion and are facts. If anyone has an issue with this you can either contact me via pm, another moderator via pm, or use the report button at the bottom right.
A forum is somewhere that ideas and views can be exchanged. This is also a community and therefore if you post you have to expect not only to have it respected but also for it to be challenged, and equally, you should respect the other user's point of view, even if it opposes yours. The use of CAPS LOCK, short sentences, and explanation marks every sentence!!!! or rhetorical questions does neither project that you respect other players views, but also very quickly makes the discussion turn non-productive. I appreciate many may feel passionate about something, but you might not always be right, and you should listen and respect others views, and not turn it into a kindergarten.
The other thing that people fail to respect is the fact the AS resources are extremely limited. I appreciate people are passionate and are very happy to complain about coding or realism, however they have to realize the business case for AS is very limited. I have done the research and you will not find a more realistic airline simulation. Yes, it has its flaws and simplifications, but if you consider what has been achieved by one person!!!! I think it's a miracle. The fact that he has allowed us access to it and therefore had to add many many many more costs it's amazing. So please all bare in mind that there is one developer, not full time, and you pay very little money comparatively to access his work. It simply not going to happen that any and every request will be listened to, or acted upon. Especially if it is only one player out of thousands requiring a day worth of programming. We simply cannot customize the game for one player. The other strange perception is that as a player you can decide on how the game works. Everyone is offered a generous trial period to see if they want to spend their money on the game or not. You pay for the game as is at that point. If there is development, fantastic, if there is none, then you can't feel cheated. Remember Sonic 1? The game is as is and never got developed, it's still a favorite.
The last point is that if you feel something is wrong with the game then feel free to report it via the support tab. From there you will be given a case number. Again you may feel that it is the most important thing in the world, but you don't see the mountains of support cases open. You will be prioritized based on how important AS feels your case is, and again you have to read about limited resources. So in short...report it properly, be patient, suck it up, they will get to you as and when yours is deemed the most worthy of the resources. Complaining about it at every turn is going to use more resources (this is currently taking up my time for working on something else for AS). Been brutally honest, we have lost supporters and players over the years through the lack of resources, and likely to continue to do so, if you feel that you fall in that category, unfortunately it's a case of so be it.
Keeping it simple...guys play nice, respect other peoples views, before you press post to consider your wording, and if it could be written less emotive, or polite.
Again none of the above is to continue on as a discussion in this thread and will be considered thread drift. Warning:- Any return to bitterness the thread will be closed permenantly.
To get the discussion back. Maybe the RUAG 228 missing from Otto is an oversite, and should be reported to AS support. I cannot, like others see, how your business plan is so dependant on a not very profitable aircraft. Equally if you really wanted to fly the 228, why not use another game world?
Yeah , realistically how important is the RUAG 228 really? Its not. You are making something out nothing and causing people hassle for the sake it. Quite frankly you come across someone who isnt very nice.
The aircraft will be made available on all game worlds with the next patch, don't worry.
But we're not intending to rush a patch just for that, I'm sorry.
The aircraft will be made available on all game worlds with the next patch, don't worry.
But we're not intending to rush a patch just for that, I'm sorry.
Thank you for your response. Appreciated.
Yeah , realistically how important is the RUAG 228 really? Its not. You are making something out nothing and causing people hassle for the sake it. Quite frankly you come across someone who isnt very nice.
Wow.
I am not ‘very nice’ because I tabled my concern and asked questions? On the other hand, I suppose you imagine yourself ‘very nice’ for telling me that my concerns are unimportant and nothing - I should not bother anyone about it? Hmmm. How very nice of you. The things one has to deal with in this forum is amazing.
Let’s not escalate this matter further. The plane is on the way, and there’s not anymore to that story. 
Any chance of including the CASA CN-235 which is in production. There is a thread from 2016 where it appears that it is on some servers but not all.
Where is the A350 ULH?
So, with the A330neo scheduled to begin commercial flights tomorrow, any updates on what the progress is concerning this plane?
http://airlinegeeks.com/2018/12/05/tap-sets-a-date-for-flights-to-sao-paulo-with-the-a330neo/