Fairly simple poll here, which we all know what it is about. Votes are hidden, just really seeing what the consensus is on this issue.
Some reading if you are not in the loop.
http://community.airlinesim.aero/topic/3512-aircraft-market-changes/
Thoughts?
You know that this voting does not have any effect! Even if 100 are voting this as “cheating”, this doesn’t say anything due to the fact that we have some thousand players! And we have a user advisory board for decissions like this elected by the player, too!
And to constantly repeating it - you still didn’t told where the line should be. You are againt punishing every one and you are not willing to give a clear definition where to drive the line. So stop spaming the forum with another thread without making clear in detail where to draw the line!
I already have told you but I will repeat it … AGAIN!
If the airline commences with the sole view to ONLY trade in aircraft until they have sufficient funds to stockpile aircraft and commence operations with a larger fleet than one can normally commence with than this is wrong. Simple? I think so!
And whilst I know there is a UAB, perhaps they can represent the interest of those who vote on this topic and do something about it. You don’t seem to want to take any positive action.
AirlineSim is open to run different types of business - passenger airline. cargo airline - you may also operate a handling enterprise or an aircraft trader if you like too. There is no limitation to operate flights only. Otherwise these options wouldn’t be available until you operate flights.
PreambelAirlineSim is an aviation related, strategic online business simulation to entertain and play with other real life player. Each player is doing this in his spare time to be entertained and to battle with other players in a fair and friendly competition. Important part is the interaction with other players.
Everyone knows that you cannot commence as an airline trader and this is a business you may get into later on. The intent of this player was to use a bug in a way it way not intended. Also a breach of a rule, it is also breaching the fair and friendly competition clause above.
You are once again wrong - so stop call this a bug using - and by the way - aviation related is not the same then airline!
Your question was asked wrong. When someone reads that question, they will ofcourse answer “no”. If you are going to ask a question as a poll, I highly recommend that you ask it properly and not sound like a 5 year old that’s complaining. Other then that, if you want one person banned…they will have to ban everyone else who used the loophole…even if the profit made was only 500$AS
Really? Here’s two words for the subject, Enough already!!!!!!!!
How many threads do we need on this god damned subject?
Who is talking about banning? Resetting would be as good.
Until someone will understand that MANY players are very unhappy of what has happened.
On the previous thread, lacisoft has made the only decent argument since this started and sk has promised to forward it to the uab.
Can’t we just wait for the outcome of that instead of going over the if’s and but’s?
No if’s and but’s. Clear statement and clear expectations.
Yes, we are waiting for the outcome.
Until something is actually done.
Every single post by Hakan609…
Nice one…first time this forum has literally made me LOL…
Talkin about being a child…
No comment on this one.
So SK and MHK … it seems the majority believe it to be the case of cheating with something that needs to be done. Do you still plan on doing nothing?
Wow, 54% and a total of 18 votes. That a VAST majority and something HAS TO BE DONE REALLY REALLY SOON!
If something needs to be done, first checking those voting ‘no’ in the post, it will save you sometime to form the list. 
The UAB has talked about this for some days now and as a member of the UAB I think it is clear now that the UAB has the following stance to the problem:
"No rules violation of any kind has happened when a player gains funds by trading planes whether it is one plane or a thousand."
There are exceptions to this verdict which we discussed (i.e. player makes multiple accounts, players does deals while exploiting the trade and/or using it to move money around from larger companies to smaller companies or when other illegal practice is discovered). But if player does not do this and simply trades planes there is no rule violation seen nor by the Airlinesim Admin Team or the UAB. This comes from the very fact that this is:
availible to any players in the game as a legitimate practice
not forced upon anyone (nobody is forcing players to buy/sell the planes of the trader)
Clearly you did not see the definition of cheating or the view of the majority here.
So let me guess, the UAB is doing nothing for the majority of the AS players?