I know that it would be completely difficult to control, but I wonder if it’s allowed to have benefits from airliners owned by relatives or close friends. I think there’s a case of it and I want to know before reporting them.
It’s suspicious because they have the same surname (in the username), airliners at same country with similar names. One of them was created today and it already has an interlining agreement with the other.
An interline agreement itself is completely okay, as there is no other benefit than connecting passengers, as with every other interline as well.
Only problem would result if the two airlines are managed by one person, or they operate from the same computer or network (IP-Address). This is forbidden.
I used the IL agreement only as an evidence. The company was founded and right after got this suspicious IL agreement. I face it as an evidence of proximity between these two accounts.
I don’t think that in the case I’m talking about it’s cheating, since one of them is on trial period and does not have a fleet. Probably the other told him about the game and he came here to check it.
But in other cases, we can have relatives playing together with some scheme that could benefit only one of the airliners.
For example:
Two relatives playing in two different worlds: A & B playing in Meigs and Tempelhof, let’s suppose.
They can create a scheme where A helps B in Meigs and then reverse it in Tempelhof, with B helping A.