Suggestions for Paine

As someone who has spent many hours playing and experimenting with different strategies, I think this update adds real depth. At the same time, I believe there are a few areas where the system could be refined further.

  1. Time Preferences by Passenger Type
    At present, passengers’ decisions seem largely cost-driven. However, in reality, the importance of time versus money differs depending on the travel class. For example:

    • Economy-class passengers tend to value lower prices over travel time.

    • Business-class passengers, on the other hand, prioritize efficiency and arrival times (e.g., preferring early morning arrivals to afternoon or midnight flights).
      Factoring this into the ORS would add greater realism and strategic depth.

  2. Airport Location Relative to City Center
    The distance of an airport from the city center is another important factor, especially for short-haul flights and business travelers. For example, I have noticed consistently low demand on SHA–HND routes across multiple servers, while flights from HND to PVG are much easier to book fully due to the larger airport size. This feels unrealistic, as SHA is far closer to central Shanghai and should be very attractive for business travelers. Accounting for the convenience of airports could help address this imbalance.

  3. Aircraft Type Evaluation for Regional Flights
    The current evaluation system discourages the use of wide-body aircraft on regional flights. In reality, however, many airlines—particularly in high-demand markets like Japan and South Korea—use high-density wide-body aircraft for such routes (e.g., HND–ITM, HND–GMP). Allowing the system to better reflect this practice would align the game more closely with real-world airline operations.

These are just some thoughts I had after exploring the new system. I’m excited about the direction AirlineSim is heading, and I hope to see more refinements in the future.

1 Like

An other suggestion is the implementation of marketing… in the beginning may work like the maintenance system… we may choice different types of marketing campaign and place (internet, TV, Radio…) and different providers of each option…

I would like to make a suggestion that I believe is very important, given the new method of calculating demand/reservations.
In real life, connecting flight prices are often not calculated leg-by-leg, but rather by route, and they are often cheaper than direct flights.
Therefore, my suggestion is to create a way to price flights differently.
I know this would be a huge challenge, so a simpler way to start would be to leave three options in the company’s settings tab:
Connecting Flight Fares:
Default: The current mode (Prices calculated leg-by-leg)
Route: The price is calculated based on a direct flight between the origin and destination
Economic: The price is adjusted to a value between 5% and 10% below the price of a direct flight between the origin and destination.
I believe this will not only make it more realistic, but also allow the maintenance of economic models like HUB Distribution’s.

2 Likes

I think the ‘Fares’ feature would cover most of the pricing ideas raised above:

1 Like