Hi guys :) I'm looking for this two aircraft : Boeing 737-700ER (winglets) and Boeing 737-900ER HGW (winglets) plan to operation on long haul (low capacity) flight, which one is better ? Sorry for my stupid english :unsure:
Ofcource the boeing 737-900ER HGW (winglets) as it has a much lower cost per seat, atleast that is what I think as your previous competitor.
AET clearly explains 737-900ERWL has way more profit potential than 700 version. Even though the 900 version is larger aircarft, it still has better fuel consumption than 700.
Here is a comparison with leisure plus seats.
1747
73G long haul has abysmal financial performance. 739ER HGW winglets, or if range permits, then the non winglet version is cheaper to operate.
Hi guys :) I'm looking for this two aircraft : Boeing 737-700ER (winglets) and Boeing 737-900ER HGW (winglets) plan to operation on long haul (low capacity) flight, which one is better ? Sorry for my stupid english :unsure:
Try the evaluation tool. U find it under options --->Aircraft Typ Evalution. Especially for beginners its perfect to find the right airplane. In the 737 family only the 737bgw, 739 bgw and 739hgw are the ones u should use. Especially the 737bgw is for the start the perfect plane. Its easy to afford and I can use it with premium seats until 4500km. Never use the 737hgw its not good at all. The easiest way to find out which planes are good is just to look which kind of planes the sucessfull big players use. Its not a coincidence that all the sucessfull players use the same planes.
319 light enhanced is very comparable to 73G BGW, 320 light enhanced has no competitor in 738 series as 738 is a performance joke costing more to operate than 739, and 321 standard enhances is a bit more expensive than 739 BGW but it has more capacity so it evens out. Depending on your configuration, I would use 320 series rather than 737 series. You have 3 capacity options (319, 320, 321) compared to 737 (73G and 739). I do not account for 736/318 which is another count in both aircraft series, simply Because of their abysmal performance compared to bigger brothers (319 and 73G respectively).
All A32XEs are bettre in all ways comperared to there 737 competitor (fuel, range, maintence, handling fee, landing fee) but the 737NG BGWs are bettre then the old A32Xs. Strangely Boeing has had the lead for such a long time before the Airbus came whit there enchantments. Perssonally though I like flying the 737s more after an almost crash whit a A320 even if I know the it was the pilots mistake and the aircraft functioned fin mostly.
All A32XEs are bettre in all ways comperared to there 737 competitor (fuel, range, maintence, handling fee, landing fee)
No. While the A32XEs are fantastic the A321 still can not hold a candle to the 73J when it comes to range with a payload. The 321 really starts to fall off around after 5500 km, while the 73J doesn't really fall off until after 7000km.
But if you operate A320 series now you will be able to get and replace with A321 LR neo in couple of years (if you stay playing that long).
No. While the A32XEs are fantastic the A321 still can not hold a candle to the 73J when it comes to range with a payload. The 321 really starts to fall off around after 5500 km, while the 73J doesn't really fall off until after 7000km.
For a longer range then the A321 just get a 787, A330, 767 or A350. Otherwise the A32XEs win all times.
For a longer range then the A321 just get a 787, A330, 767 or A350. Otherwise the A32XEs win all times.
And add another type on routes that might not need the capacity of a wide body? Not really smart.
Also while the A319 enhanced has closed the gap on price per seat on the 737-700, the 737 still is a cheaper option.
And add another type on routes that might not need the capacity of a wide body? Not really smart.
Also while the A319 enhanced has closed the gap on price per seat on the 737-700, the 737 still is a cheaper option.
My A321 have a total of 108 seats and my 787-8 have 133 seats not that big of a difference and really everybody needs a 787 anyways so it is not an extra cathegory atall. I do not see your point an airline can do great whit only 3 categories Ejets, A32XEs and 787s or A32XEs, 787s and A380. You do not need more then the ones I stated and basically all other planes are useless and if you want some useless planes also, then found a subsidairy whit useless planes.
I am not counting the regional planes like ATRs, CRJs and LETs which are not useless but they realistically have no place in a main airline so they have to be in a regional subsidairy.
Conclusion: Have on airline operating A32XEs, 787s and A380s and a regional airline operating Ejets, ATRs and LETs or dump the LETs and have CRJs, Ejets and ATRs instad. You have the market filled from 18 seats to 500 seats and best operating range from 200km to 16000km, and all aircraft I did not state are useless rubbish and none can match the ones I stated basically they all are the best in there class.
I do not unserstand why you have 330 737-900ER BGW and also 853 A321s and why you have 5 maintenance categories in one airline.
My A321 have a total of 108 seats and my 787-8 have 133 seats not that big of a difference and really everybody needs a 787 anyways so it is not an extra cathegory atall. I do not see your point an airline can do great whit only 3 categories Ejets, A32XEs and 787s or A32XEs, 787s and A380. You do not need more then the ones I stated and basically all other planes are useless and if you want some useless planes also, then found a subsidairy whit useless planes.
I am not counting the regional planes like ATRs, CRJs and LETs which are not useless but they realistically have no place in a main airline so they have to be in a regional subsidairy.
Conclusion: Have on airline operating A32XEs, 787s and A380s and a regional airline operating Ejets, ATRs and LETs or dump the LETs and have CRJs, Ejets and ATRs instad. You have the market filled from 18 seats to 500 seats and best operating range from 200km to 16000km, and all aircraft I did not state are useless rubbish and none can match the ones I stated basically they all are the best in there class.
I do not unserstand why you have 330 737-900ER BGW and also 853 A321s and why you have 5 maintenance categories in one airline.
Funny how in another thread you talk about running a realistic airline, then you state you only have 133 seats in your 787. Yeah, that just screams of realism..... :wacko:
The 737s are not "rubbish". The 700 is still cheaper to operate than the 319, and the 900 has better range than the 321, and is only a dollar or two more expensive per seat than the 321. The 800 is the only iffy plane out there, and it holds its own on short haul flights.
As for my airline, I really only have four maintenance categories, the ATR was leased by mistake and will be leaving shortly.
Funny how in another thread you talk about running a realistic airline, then you state you only have 133 seats in your 787. Yeah, that just screams of realism..... :wacko:
There are 787s whit less then 40 seats I see nothing strange whit that also if it makes you happy I have some 787-8s for shorthaul whit 188 seats. Also most of them make enourmous profits. If need any more capacity I just put an A380 whit 372 seats (456 seats for shorthaul) on the route and it is perfect actually even Asian (the only airline I have which I personally like, also the smallest) is soon getting the mighty A380.
There are no first seats on the configurations I stated.
I do not unserstand why you have 330 737-900ER BGW and also 853 A321s and why you have 5 maintenance categories in one airline.
I could understand his position, I had the same approach with my USA airline, I operate both 737 and 320 series, simply because of faster expansion opportunities. When you earn net profit of several hundred million AS dollars per week, then something like additional 10 million AS dollars per week in maintenance costs is really not that much when you can expand faster; consider the opportunity cost of foregone expansion; sometimes for a fast expansion I have seen players using A320, 737, CRJ and Ejets as well, all being ordered at the same time. With these 4 maintenance categories you can order 57 new aircraft per week.
I run differently. Every dollar you can save should be saved I know 10 million is not much but can you save 10 million you should save 10 million. Still it is about 3 A321 or 1 A380. Which if you can not use it then use it in a subsidairy by selling and transering bought aircraft forwards and backwards, and still I can order A321, A320, 787 and A380 in my main airline and then ATRs, CRJs and Ejets in my regional subsidiary and also order aircraft in my subsidairies all around the world, and if a airline whit 300 A320s falls and have gotten down to a pretty decent price I want to have the money to get all those planes and not let any down to competitors. At this moment I have liquidated all airlines exept Asian so I can not do that but hopefully in a couple of months Asian will reach a weekly profit of 100 million.
Once you are on a profit level let’s say 300 million per week, that’s 3 billion in 10 Weeks of net profit with 100 million in additional maintenance expenses. That still leaves 2.9 billion to work with every 10 weeks. How frequently do the huge opportunities present themselves. … certainly not every week and I doubt you can see a huge opportunity once every 10 weeks. … and with billions in the bank just sitting there … I would prefer creating new hub in Des Moines Iowa and order those additional planes. …
Once you are on a profit level let's say 300 million per week, that's 3 billion in 10 Weeks of net profit with 100 million in additional maintenance expenses. That still leaves 2.9 billion to work with every 10 weeks. How frequently do the huge opportunities present themselves. .. certainly not every week and I doubt you can see a huge opportunity once every 10 weeks. .. and with billions in the bank just sitting there .... I would prefer creating new hub in Des Moines Iowa and order those additional planes. ...
Maybe every third month or so on Stapleton you also get proud of your self that you have so high profits and so high profit margins and you can do alittle bit of braging. I am going on vacation on monday and I want my airline to auto run when I come back seeing my equity doubled and I need every dollar. Also at this moment Asian is not up at a 300 million profit and I need every dollar I can get to get out competitors. Every dollar I can get here is a dollar I can spend there to kill competitors.
Did not mean as bragging. I am competing against players that earn net profit (not revenue!) with their holdings of well over 1 billion AS dollars per week (close to 1.5) … I just meant to say that after a certain threshold of earnings You Really do not care about one or two more maintenance categories … actually the biggest earners have 5 or 6 categories from what I have seen.
And I am on vacation myself, my airlines have been running on autopilot for the past two weeks, I am not capable of managing airline on a 5 inch phone screen, but they have been racking in profit after profit … and we have mid-700 AGEX.
Enjoy your vacation, and I know your model is good so your airlines will do nicely and earn you pile of money while you are swimming in the sea or hiking in the mountains.
Why would a 787 with 130 seats beeing so unrealistic? ANA operates them with 166seats. So if u put in a little more premium then u can fly them with 130 seats ;).