New game with old holes

Hi , guys !

Looks like it is time to share some things about problems of this simulator for all 12 games...

I've been into game "greigs" from the beginning , almost 3 years...What I find out ?

 1. This simulator giving a chance for chiting from the beginning . 

Take a look on airline "American Aviation" based at Seattle . This airline have 7 An-158 with configuration C42Y57 and 1 Boeing -737-600 with configuration C78Y71. Same pictures with some other airlines...

 -Gingko Airlines based at PHX

 6 An-158 C44Y55

 1 An-148 C40Y45

 1 B-736   C78Y71

- Yunnan Falcon based at ATL

 1 A-320-200 C60Y114

 2 A-321-200 C96Y120

-Desert Camel Airline based at Honolulu

 1 B736 C48Y101

 2 B739 C60Y160

All this four airlines have full load and huge profit...and game easy giving a chance for player to get it  with fake configuration . It is clear water's cheating. More , take a look on types of aircrafts and type of fake configurations - similar ! This is not four players - this only one player who playing under four different nicknames .All four airlines are in same alliance and interlining. This player trying to be a dictator on us -market... Same pictures happens in "greigs" game . Same player get same strategy and the administration never had time to figure out it , but they charge him for blocking slots in LAX airport as Voeini Airways. This Voeni and Air San Francisco , maybe some other "daughter companies" never had game against each other , only cooperating and been in interlining and in same alliance. Finally , greigs have only 285 of 1200 players because all beginners airlines have been "killed" and people just quit the game.

2. Problem with maintenance system.

Does somebody took a look on maintenance ? Price showing as lousy , excellent , good and etc . Who decide what is that price ? Maybe it for them this price is louse but for me this price is excellent ? Same "crazy" with quality and maintenance categories for every airplane - no certain amount of money per works. More , if i need to have only one maintenance per week - i have to load airplane with schedule that giving maintenance rating closer to 1 , it could be 1,43 or so . What is mean 1.43 . guys? when they making second maintenance , they will screw off wheels and never put it back because it 1.43 number ? Plus , you never know how to reduce or stabilize maintenance expenses . All this alien maintenance system have to be made as aviation...

3. Finally , i'd quite meigs and i'd start play here... Do you know why? My airline company having the value as half of billion AS dollars have been call as bankrupt just because had expect to get risk loan for 4 million dollars for payday. Are you really guys? You liquidate company to zero that had own fleet for 250 million dollars and terminals across USA for 250 million dollars too and load factor 86,3 % for 135 airplanes ? It could not be zero anyway . In case of no credit from bank you have to stop operations of airline and force to airline to sell own airplane or own terminal and pay salary but not to sign off to zero...It is not right and it have to be corrected because this game called as simulator...

4. Last ten days of my game in griegs i spent a lot of time and "money" for the searching interesting transpolar and transatlantic routes for my airlines. I'd find some really interesting for using here but what i'd figure out by the way...Online reservation system doe'snt give connections for flights directed from west to east via polar if traditional direction goes from west to east with no polar .For example , route Frankfurt - Schenzschen /SZX/. No nonstop flights on this direction . In case of you creat flight FRA-Honolulu-SZX , it have no connections for sale in system by this flight , does,nt matter if it cheapest ticket. Generally , system does'nt work as in present world for Asiana Airlines , Emirates and others  do.

Thanks for attention.

Alex / SOLARIS Alfa Airways/

There isn't anything wrong with those configurations. They are using the cheapest seats in the tightest formation. There are plenty of other airlines out there that have earned a lot more passengers and money in this short amount of time.

you can not use "banchs" for economy and business classes for make huge profit just because it is start of the game. Nobody gonna fly by this aircraft in close live . It is cheating for making money for fast buying more aircrafts to get dominating in a market. If you want to be a dominant let play following some real rules and show us your business intelligent not cheating. Bad this game giving a chance for player like that...

I don't know what "banches" are.

check "google images" for banch , please.

Banch, according to Google:  [n] (law) the seat for judges in a courtroom

So, according to you, I cannot use a judge seat for economy and business classes for making huge profits just because it is start of the game?

Usually, I'm able to figure out what someone is saying when English isn't their first language. I believe you are saying they are using these configurations to make the most money. I checked all four of these airlines. My airline has had more passengers than three of these four airlines, and I am using Embraer 195s. My airplanes have more seats, and cost less to fly and land. I don't know how much money they have, but for now, I think I probably have more than they do. Does that mean I'm cheating too?

Looks like this one really bite you ...lol . In American English and at google images the word "banch" have only one meaning : wood seat . You don't know it ? :-) Please , don't try to be as idiot here . Anyway , Antonov-158 , for example, is expected to be 99 seats in economy class only and 86 seats in configuration of two classes : Y74+C12 ,not Y55+C44 for normal using. Same way for Boeing-736 , the configuration for normal using not expecting C48Y101 . About your Embraers...Looks like you using banchs too . Are you that guy who had creat that other four airlines? :-) See , fifth one is showed up....lol

I think he is talking about benches.

As for the rest, I too don´t really see what all the fuss is about.

you can not use "banchs" for economy and business classes for make huge profit just because it is start of the game.

Why not? I dont see any rules against it. The cabin configuration is up to the players. It will not work when the market is saturated but it does now.

gonna fly by this aircraft in close live . It is cheating...

There is a difference between real life and this game. Why are you not exploiting it? Do you never think outside the box? The more people exploit an inefficiency the quicker it will be closed.

 This is not four players - this only one player who playing under four different nicknames .All four airlines are in same alliance and interlining. This player trying to be a dictator on us -market… Same pictures happens in “greigs” game .

I think he wants us to know that these Airlines or Accounts being used by only one User. So Multiaccount... 

But I dont understand how to get C78Y71 in a B736 oO

Reading this guy's posts gives me a headache.

Has any of the player(s) been reported to AS if there is cheating?

I see a lot of different opinions here.

I have to agree with alex11369 it is not realistic the seating configuration at the beginning of the game. We have overcame one obstacle with removing old planes but it did not solve the problem completely.

What I think would have worker is that at the beginning of the new world the whole demand would be decreased by 90% (its could be done manually controlling AGEX or other ways but this is for AS to decide) and increase it by 5% every week until we back to normal level at this time Automatic AGEX would be turned on.

This would fix the unrealistic demand where you can have configuration of 50Y 50C with standard seating and 140% price level which most of us do now. Moreover, there would be no need to remove old planes.

Now I am not saying that I am unsatisfied or anything this is just my opinion I am happy with new world and everyone is doing what the game allows us to do to get the most profit in the end this is a business simulator. 

Reading this guy's posts gives me a headache.

Call your airline name , hub and what exactly configuration you using at your type of aircrafts - people have to know a hero.

If anyone wanted to find me on the server, they can. They don't need me to do the work for them. But thanks for calling me a hero. I appreciate it. :)

caithes have Y108. Seats Leisure Plus. Airplane Embrear 195.

Is possible!

 1 B-736   C78Y71

Please tell me how this should work? I got this plane too and tried so many ways but I don't get it.

I think the staff will be interested too. So they maybe can provide this in future.

It's very easy to do .... Use Slimline seats for Business and Economy Class.....  but you have to offer both seats very cheap to get the passengers ... once the competition kicks in after 3-4 weeks you will not be able to attract many passengers with this kind of cheap seats. 

So after 3-4 weeks you are fucked up with this configuration... So what? If this company manages good or not, will be shown after some more time. Thats no cheat for me. That's a kind of Bug-using... But you have to manage intelligent after 3-4 weeks... This is competition... So I don't see the problem... 

But if this works for a much longer time, I wouldn't see that as a fair advantage.

Everybody says this is a game. But this is a simulation. I think the meaning of a simulation is to get as close to the reallity as it can. 

It's very easy to do .... Use Slimline seats for Business and Economy Class.....  but you have to offer both seats very cheap to get the passengers ... once the competition kicks in after 3-4 weeks you will not be able to attract many passengers with this kind of cheap seats. 

Exactly. That's why I don't think it's that big of a deal. There might be other loopholes that can be exploited, but Aspern has a lot of aspects that make it extremely fair for everyone.

caithes have Y108. Seats Leisure Plus. Airplane Embrear 195.

Is possible!

Yep, exactly. Works pretty well, too. Now I'm just deciding on whether to stay with the 195 or move onto something a little bit bigger.