I can assume you were the first one to of pressed the report button? Or did you not bother?
So your "unbiased" agenda is against anyone who decided against a problem that has existed in AS for many many years?
By the way I liked the bottom part of the post as he agreed with me? Something wrong with that?
You mean the bottom of the post were he says that a player needs his diaper changed? Yes there is something wrong with that. I didn't report the post because I am used to the low brow from certain members. However I would assume, and maybe thats my fault for assuming, that if you are offended by someone saying that certain members are in an inner circle, you would be offended by personal attacks.
If you are going to use "real life" as a justification for a transaction, then you can't ignore real life when implementing a new rule. Neither of these things really effect me, I could knock out an airline that has 100 737s that were given to them for free, and I had like 5 planes that violated the slot rule. My agenda is looking for consistency from the UAB and AS. So far the only consistency I have seen is that if it benefits them, they are all for it. If it doesn't benefit them, well then it is the biggest crises that AS faces.
It's really starting to get ridiculous now...as I said earlier in this thread, in my opinion both sides have a point. However, constantly repeating and repeating the arguments won't do any good and only disqualifies the person who does so. Just because something is repeated a lot doesn't make it right. What do you expect to happen? To get Highscores and Specialists' airlines deleted? That won't (and shouldn't) happen, because they did not break the rules in force at that moment in time...nothing new is being added to this discussion, it turned into a repetition of accusations ad naseum...I think this thread should be closed and there should be new rules introduced for those participating in the forum to make sure that a minimum quality in the forum is guaranteed
What do you expect to happen? To get Highscores and Specialists' airlines deleted? That won't (and shouldn't) happen, because they did not break the rules in force at that moment in time
Maybe, just maybe, some people are trying to get the rules changed. That way it won't happen in the future. It is why some of us have proposed new rules to try and fix it.
You mean the bottom of the post were he says that a player needs his diaper changed? Yes there is something wrong with that. I didn't report the post because I am used to the low brow from certain members. However I would assume, and maybe thats my fault for assuming, that if you are offended by someone saying that certain members are in an inner circle, you would be offended by personal attacks.
If you are going to use "real life" as a justification for a transaction, then you can't ignore real life when implementing a new rule. Neither of these things really effect me, I could knock out an airline that has 100 737s that were given to them for free, and I had like 5 planes that violated the slot rule. My agenda is looking for consistency from the UAB and AS. So far the only consistency I have seen is that if it benefits them, they are all for it. If it doesn't benefit them, well then it is the biggest crises that AS faces.
When a feature becomes available on IP.Board and AS uses it I will definitely use the "like half a post".
Nothing will come of it. This is a situation that should not be allowed to happen in the future. However you will not see a change, as members of the UAB, the AS team, or the "inner circle" that can't be on the UAB because of being caught cheating benefit from it. Their only concern is gameplay that negatively effects them.
You are clearly suggesting that all members of the UAB and AST are part of the so called, mysterious, with a funny hand shake "inner circle". Not some members as you are now stating.
I really don't want to get into a slot blocking argument again because it just goes round in circles, but keeping it simple. AST decided on a method that would work, UAB decided on the lines, lines had to be drawn somewhere. The timeline for this was over 2 years. Not overnight. It has been readdressed, revoted on and the lines remained as originally agreed. Someone was going to get pissed off somewhere, and a LITTLE realism was lost, but also A LOT more gained. Ie removal of Islanders from LHR!
You are clearly suggesting that all members of the UAB and AST are part of the so called, mysterious, with a funny hand shake "inner circle". Not some members as you are now stating.
I
I understand that this board has people who's first language is not English, so I will give you some slack. The OR in that sentence indicates that the "inner circle" is a different group of members that can't be on the UAB because they were caught cheating than the UAB and AS team.
Guys, as I have stated previously. The discussion here is way off topic and has reduced itself to attacks against each others.
This is why I close this thread. If you want to discuss whether cheap leases should be allowed or not, please open a new thread and stay on that topic, refraining from personal attacks.